<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Roadmap for Adobe LCDS 3 </title>
	<atom:link href="http://flexblog.faratasystems.com/2009/12/21/the-roadmap-for-adobe-lcds-3%e2%80%a8-model-driven-development/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://flexblog.faratasystems.com/2009/12/21/the-roadmap-for-adobe-lcds-3%e2%80%a8-model-driven-development</link>
	<description>A blog about our experience with Adobe Flex</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 02:18:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://flexblog.faratasystems.com/2009/12/21/the-roadmap-for-adobe-lcds-3%e2%80%a8-model-driven-development/comment-page-1#comment-53982</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 03:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flexblog.faratasystems.com/?p=498#comment-53982</guid>
		<description>Hello Yakov, yes, it just happened upon the release of LCDS 3.0.  
See the changes Adobe made here:  http://www.adobe.com/products/livecycle/dataservices/faq/

The product manager fields questions and feedback on it here:
http://anilchannappa.org/2009/11/20/lcds-3-0-released/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Yakov, yes, it just happened upon the release of LCDS 3.0.<br />
See the changes Adobe made here:  <a href="http://www.adobe.com/products/livecycle/dataservices/faq/" rel="nofollow">http://www.adobe.com/products/livecycle/dataservices/faq/</a></p>
<p>The product manager fields questions and feedback on it here:<br />
<a href="http://anilchannappa.org/2009/11/20/lcds-3-0-released/" rel="nofollow">http://anilchannappa.org/2009/11/20/lcds-3-0-released/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yakov Fain</title>
		<link>http://flexblog.faratasystems.com/2009/12/21/the-roadmap-for-adobe-lcds-3%e2%80%a8-model-driven-development/comment-page-1#comment-53872</link>
		<dc:creator>Yakov Fain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flexblog.faratasystems.com/?p=498#comment-53872</guid>
		<description>Matthew,

Is this &quot;evaporation&quot; something new? Can you please provide the relevant links? 
Meanwhile, we can help you switch to BlazeDS with professional technical support as described &lt;a href=&quot;http://flexblog.faratasystems.com/2009/11/17/farata-systems-offers-enterprise-support-for-blazeds&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; over here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matthew,</p>
<p>Is this &#8220;evaporation&#8221; something new? Can you please provide the relevant links?<br />
Meanwhile, we can help you switch to BlazeDS with professional technical support as described <a href="http://flexblog.faratasystems.com/2009/11/17/farata-systems-offers-enterprise-support-for-blazeds" rel="nofollow"> over here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://flexblog.faratasystems.com/2009/12/21/the-roadmap-for-adobe-lcds-3%e2%80%a8-model-driven-development/comment-page-1#comment-52591</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 19:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flexblog.faratasystems.com/?p=498#comment-52591</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, the LCDS express edition evaporated into thin air, leaving those of us who were using it high and dry.  The departmental version for up to 100 users also evaporated...  I don&#039;t know how they can justify such blatant disregard for those of us who have been developing for the platform for years, depending on the affordable licenses to be available long term.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, the LCDS express edition evaporated into thin air, leaving those of us who were using it high and dry.  The departmental version for up to 100 users also evaporated&#8230;  I don&#8217;t know how they can justify such blatant disregard for those of us who have been developing for the platform for years, depending on the affordable licenses to be available long term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Collins</title>
		<link>http://flexblog.faratasystems.com/2009/12/21/the-roadmap-for-adobe-lcds-3%e2%80%a8-model-driven-development/comment-page-1#comment-48400</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 16:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flexblog.faratasystems.com/?p=498#comment-48400</guid>
		<description>Working as an enterprise flex architect, rather than Adobe provide a LCDS Load testing tool, I would rather see them provide a ready made application that demonstrates all available protocol combinations ( AMF, RTMP, HTTP, Messaging / Secure, Unsecure / NIO, Non-NIO, etc. ) but whose flex client gets the list of services dynamically from the services-config.xml file, so I can use that file to hone down to the specific protocols I want test data for. Then,make it easy to hook into that application using common enterprise load testing tools like NeoLoad and LoadRunner.

Here at my client&#039;s site, they have standardized on Load Runner and it has been a royal pain having to put something together that will give accurate results in their environment, between having to get ports opened in the appzone firewall for NIO and RTMP to work properly, getting the application (using messaging) to work properly in a Weblogic/BigIP load balanced environment, where it all has to work with Load Runner ( HP can&#039;t even seem to help much with figuring out what their application needs from the Load Testing application to get proper results! ). If Adobe could ease THIS pain, I would be a very happy man.

Also, I would add to the list proper support for WSRP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Working as an enterprise flex architect, rather than Adobe provide a LCDS Load testing tool, I would rather see them provide a ready made application that demonstrates all available protocol combinations ( AMF, RTMP, HTTP, Messaging / Secure, Unsecure / NIO, Non-NIO, etc. ) but whose flex client gets the list of services dynamically from the services-config.xml file, so I can use that file to hone down to the specific protocols I want test data for. Then,make it easy to hook into that application using common enterprise load testing tools like NeoLoad and LoadRunner.</p>
<p>Here at my client&#8217;s site, they have standardized on Load Runner and it has been a royal pain having to put something together that will give accurate results in their environment, between having to get ports opened in the appzone firewall for NIO and RTMP to work properly, getting the application (using messaging) to work properly in a Weblogic/BigIP load balanced environment, where it all has to work with Load Runner ( HP can&#8217;t even seem to help much with figuring out what their application needs from the Load Testing application to get proper results! ). If Adobe could ease THIS pain, I would be a very happy man.</p>
<p>Also, I would add to the list proper support for WSRP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
